Drawing for GENIUS THEATRE

USPTO serial 75573721

GENIUS THEATRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENIUS THEATRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Durlacher

JAMES M DURLACHER WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, MORIARTY111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009television receivers and integrated receiver decodersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 13, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 16, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 19, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance