Drawing for WARREN MILLER

USPTO serial 75573812

WARREN MILLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WARREN MILLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clark D. Gross

CLARK D GROSS FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP865 S FIGUEROA ST 29TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Sun screen; cosmetics, namely compacts, concealers, children's play cosmetics, foundation, oil, shampoos, soaps, toners, and bronzers; perfumes and suntan lotionACTIVE—
005Pharmaceuticals for human consumption, namely, vitamins and supplements, and health care products, namely medical devices, bandages, injury support devices, salves, lotions and other non-prescription pharmaceuticals; and health foodsACTIVE—
009Eye wear, namely, glasses, sunglasses, eye protectors, goggles, and contact lensesACTIVE—
014Timepieces, namely clocks, wristwatches, timers and pocket watchesACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely books and guides relating to exercise, travel and outdoor adventure, stationary, paintings, posters, wall hangings of paper, photographs and postcardsACTIVE—
018Luggage, backpacks, suitcases, briefcases, purses, duffel bags and sports bagsACTIVE—
021Household and kitchen utensils, namely plates, cups, saucers, mugs and display platesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely head wear, hats, caps, visors, stocking caps; shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, polo shirts, coats, jackets, overcoats, underwear, thermal underwear, raincoats, pants, shorts, athletic apparel consisting of athletic shoes, hats, sweat bands, shirts, shorts, pants, ski wear, hiking wear, swim wear; shoes, sandals, boots, slippers, track shoes, tennis shoes, athletic shoes and ski bootsACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely snow skis, water skis, snow boards and ski polesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance