USPTO serial 75573874
GALAPAGOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GALAPAGOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
200 MICHELAN, BE
2333 AL Leiden, NL
2333 AL Leiden, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent N. Palladino
VINCENT N PALLADINO FISH & NEAVE1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Biochemicals for use in the field of genetic pharmacology, namely, genetic materials for the manufacture, research and development of gene and cell therapy products | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical components in the field of genetic pharmacology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and medical research, consulting and technology licensing services in the field of genetic pharmacology, development of test systems, data banks or databases in the medical field and the biochemical field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GALAPAGOS GENOMICS N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by IntroGene B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by IntroGene B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GALAPAGOS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |