USPTO serial 75573899
UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DELEGACY OF LOCAL EXAMINATIONS DOMJ MINA NVS TIO ILLV MEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DELEGACY OF LOCAL EXAMINATIONS DOMJ MINA NVS TIO ILLV MEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY PRINTED FORMS BOOKS, BOOKLETS, AND BROCHURES IN THE FIELD OF CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE AMERICAN LANGUAGE EXAMINATIONS; AND PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FIELD OF AMERICAN ENGLISH LANGUAGE | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 1995 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY ARRANGING, PROVIDING AND CONDUCTING WORKPLACE AND ACADEMIC COURSES AND EXAMINATION IN THE USE OF THE AMERICAN ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND WORKSHOPS FOR INTERACTIVE TRAINING IN USE OF THE AMERICAN ENGLISH LANGUAGE; AND EDUCATIONAL TESTING | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Babowal & Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DELEGACY OF LOCAL EXAMINATIONS DOMJ MINA NVS TIO ILLV MEA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |