USPTO serial 75573908
CORVIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2913406Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2004
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CORVIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COLUMBIA, MD
Columbia, MD
Columbia, MD
Columbia, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARREN E WOLF
DARREN E WOLF CORVIS CORPP O BOX 9400COLUMBIA, MD 21046-9400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL TRANSMISSION, RECEIVING, AND NETWORKING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, SWITCHES, CROSS-CONNECTS, ROUTERS, AMPLIFIERS, ADD/DROP MULTIPLEXERS, GRATINGS, MULTIPLEXERS, DEMULTIPLEXERS, REGENERATORS, AND OPTICAL NETWORK AND ELEMENT MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, AND OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS EMPLOYING SUCH NAMED OPTICAL EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 2001 |
| 037 | Providing maintenance services to the order and/or specification of others in the field of optical transmission, receiving, and networking equipment namely, transmitters, receivers, switches, cross-connects, routers, amplifiers, add/drop multiplexers, gratings, multiplexers and demultiplexers, and computer systems, and maintenance services for computer hardware, and optical systems and networks employing such named optical equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, DEPLOYMENT, AND ARCHITECTURE SERVICES TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF OPTICAL TRANSMISSION, RECEIVING, AND NETWORKING EQUIPMENT NAMELY, TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, SWITCHES, CROSS-CONNECTS, ROUTERS, AMPLIFIERS, ADD/DROP MULTIPLESERS, GRATINGS, MULTIPLEXERS AND DEMULTIPLEXERS, AND OPTICAL NETWORK AND ELEMENT MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR OPTICAL NETWORK SOFTWARE, ELEMENT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, PLANNING SOFTWARE, AND INTERFACE SOFTWARE, AND OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS EMPLOYING SUCH NAMED OPTICAL EQUIPMENT, AND CONSULTATION SERVICES THERETO | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROADWING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Corvis Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Corvis Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Corvis Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CORVIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |