USPTO serial 75574042
C.B.R.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C.B.R.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
33017 Tarcento (UD), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S EGBERT
JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT1018 PRESTON ST STE 100HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cold and hot rolling machines and plants; steel mill and casting machines and plants; water purification machines and plants; gas purification plants and machines; crushing and recycling machines and plants for metal scrap; drawing mills; hot and cold iron working plants and machines; plants and machines for the transport and packaging of rolled and drawn products | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Heating and melting overs and plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Planning and consultation services for factories and rolling mills, steel mills, drawing mills, and hot and cold iron works | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |