USPTO serial 75574198
ENLIVEN/IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENLIVEN/IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre
PETER L MICHAELSON MICHAELSON & WALLACEPO BOX 8489 328 NEWMAN SPGS RDRED BANK, NJ 07701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ONLINE ADVERTISING AND ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, BRANDING AND DIRECT MARKETING VIA DISSEMINATION OF ONLINE ADVERTISEMENTS, AND TRACKING, MEASURING AND ANALYZING SAME | ACTIVE | May 4, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |