USPTO serial 75574564
BOND-COAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2001
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOND-COAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW D. PRICE
ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | LIQUID COATINGS AND POLYMER PRE-COATINGS FOR USE ON MEDICAL DEVICES FOR BONDING AND SEALING SURFACES OF THESE DEVICES TO PROVIDE ANCHORAGE FOR LUBRICANT COATING FORMULATIONS [, MEDICATED COATING FORMULATIONS, BIOACTIVE COATING FORMULATIONS, ULTRASOUND IMAGING COATING FORMULATIONS, AND COATINGS THAT CREATE A CONTRAST-ENHANCING LAYER FOR IMPROVED MEDICAL IMAGING ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |