USPTO serial 75574669
Serial No. 75574669
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2733630Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2003
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75574669?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
33080 FIUME VENETO, IT
33080 FIUME VENETO, IT
33080 FIUME VENETO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman
John Clarke Holman Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th St., NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [ HAND TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS FOR GARDENING, HORTICULTURE AND AGRICULTURE, namely, DIGGING TROWELS, TRANSPLANTING TROWELS, WEEDING TROWELS, THREE-PRONG FLOWER FORKS, COMBINED DIBBERS AND PLANTERS, DIBBERS, MINI-HOES, LEVEL HEAD RAKES, HAND OPERATED SPREADERS FOR FERTILIZER ASPERSION ON LAWNS, FLOWERS AND PLANTS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRONIC UNITS FOR THE CONTROL OF WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | WATER DISTRIBUTION APPARATUS, DEVICES AND SYSTEMS, NAMELY DRIPPER IRRIGATION DEVICES, NAMELY DRIPPERS, IN-LINE DRIPPERS, SELF-REGULATING DRIPPERS, ADJUSTABLE DRIPPERS, STAKE-MOUNTED DRIPPERS; UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION DEVICES, NAMELY, POP-UP SPRINKLERS, MICROSPRINKLERS, AND DISASSEMBLED GARDEN SPRINKLERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ HOSE WINDING CARTS; CLEANING UP CARTS FOR GATHERING LEAVES, GRASS CUTTINGS, AND PAPER; AND WHEELBARROWS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | SPRINKLING GARDEN HOSES, WATERING HOSES NOT OF METAL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | HOSE FITTINGS AND CONNECTORS MADE OF PLASTIC; NON-MECHANICAL WINDING REELS, MADE OF PLASTIC FOR HOSES; PLASTIC CONTAINERS FOR FERTILIZER TABLETS; SPRINKLING HOSE TERMINALS MADE OF PLASTIC | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | FLEXIBLE AND ROTATING WASH BRUSHES WITH WATER FLOW CONTROL VALVE TO CLEAN CARS, WALKWAYS, TERRACE PAVEMENTS; SPRINKLERS FOR LAWNS, GARDENS, AND VEGETABLE GARDENS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; TROUGHS AND DRINKING TROUGHS FOR ANIMALS; HOUSEHOLD CONTAINERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL OR COATED THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLABER S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CLABER S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CLABER S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |