USPTO serial 75574720
OPTICALM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTICALM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
4002 Basel, CH
4002 Basel, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRIS DONINGER
NANCY E SABARRA FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Veterinary products, namely, ophthalmic preparations for cats, dogs and other companion animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |