USPTO serial 75574788
MEDIATAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIATAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hayes, Middlesex UB3 I HH, GB
Hayes, Middlesex UB3 I HH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Oliff
JAMES OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer hardware, namely computer hard disks; tuners; radios; televisions; interconnection and feeder cables; modems; uninterruptible power supplies (UPS); computer monitors; apparatus for aerial amplification and distribution of an audio or video signal, namely, radio and television transmitters or receivers, video recorders or players, audio recorders or players; data processors; apparatus, namely, monitors, encoders, decoders, audio and video recorders, audio and video players, for storing and processing analog and digital data; computer software, namely, for computer games, video games, for encoding and decoding audio and video signals; telecommunication apparatus, namely, modems to enable connection to databases and telecommunication networks; electronic data storage, namely, blank integrated circuit cards, blank floppy disks for computers, blank magnetic computer disks, microchips, blank video cassettes; electronic circuits; audio tape recorders; video tape recorders; apparatus for storing and carrying magnetic data, namely, magnetic tapes, magnetic floppy disks for computers, mini-disks for mini-disk recorders and players; apparatus for encoding and decoding analog and digital signals, namely, a decoder and an encoder | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcasting services, namely television broadcasting and transmission of radio or television broadcasting signals; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and decryption; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminal; provision of services through the global computer network namely for monitoring audio and video files on the global computer network and verifying whether these signals contain an electronic watermark | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of broadcasting and global computer network monitoring for the use and misuse of audio and video signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MediaTag Limited
- Other trademarks owned by MediaTag Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MEDIATAG
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |