USPTO serial 75574905
ACCUO2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCUO2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minnesota Innovative Technologies and Instruments Corporation
Lino Lakes, MN
Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Innovative Technologies and Instruments Corporation
Minnesota Innovative Technologies and Instruments Corporation
Lino Lakes, MN
Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Innovative Technologies and Instruments Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADAM M. SOFFER
ADAM M SOFFER HINSHAW & CULBERTSON3100 CAMPBELL MITHUN TWR222 S NINTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, an automated oxygen regulator for administering oxygen flow in response to a blood-oxygen level monitor component | ACTIVE | Jul 7, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Innovative Technologies and Instruments Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Innovative Technologies and Instruments Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ACCUO2
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |