Drawing for Serial No. 75575024

USPTO serial 75575024

Serial No. 75575024

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75575024?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. LAUBSCHER, SR.

LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER SR LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER745 S 23RD ST STE 300ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BATTERY-POWERED ELECTROMAGNETIC COATING THICKNESS GAUGEACTIVEApr 16, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Mar 25, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance