Drawing for LIFEPLANS COMPLETE CARE NATIONAL NETWORK

USPTO serial 75575112

LIFEPLANS COMPLETE CARE NATIONAL NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFEPLANS COMPLETE CARE NATIONAL NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES GREGORY CULLEM

JAMES GREGORY CULLEM MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRISGLOVSKY AND POPEO, PCONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042advisory services, namely providing information relating to long term risk and care management to insurance providersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 6, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance