USPTO serial 75575113
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle D. Kahn
MICHELLE D KAHN SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR17TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order catalog services featuring gourmet food products, namely, meats, seafood, caviar, soup mixes and stocks, chili mixes, tomato products, oils, egg substitutes, dried mushrooms, fruits and nuts, pickled vegetables, vegetable purees, condiments, olives, coconut milk, cheese, cheese straws, vinegars, sauces, marinades, honey, maple syrups, dried chilies, salad dressings, spices, crushed ginger with lemon, pasta and noodles, grains, capers, caperberries, curry paste, cereals, flours, sugars, baking mixes, breads, coffees, teas, ice cream, fruits, vegetables, herbs, fresh truffles, beans, cut flowers, cocktail mixes, pomegranate essence, and wine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |