Drawing for WR12

USPTO serial 75575159

WR12

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WR12?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barth X. deRosa,

BARTH X DEROSA STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER, LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Engines not for land vehicles and motors for boats and airplanesACTIVE—
012Automobiles and structural parts therefor and engines for automobiles and structural parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 7, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 7, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 5, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 26, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 25, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance