USPTO serial 75575210
ZIPCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JORGE C. BARRENO
JORGE C BARRENO APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS DIVISION850 LINCOLN CTR DRFOSTER CITY, CA 94404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Reagents, kits and DNA arrays kits both comprised primarily of reagents and DNA arrays all for scientific and medical research in the field of genetic analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Clinical and diagnostic reagents, kits and DNA arrays kits both comprised primarily of clinical and diagnostic reagents and DNA arrays all for use in genetic analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perkin-Elmer Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Perkin-Elmer Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by PE Corporation (NY)
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ZIPCHIP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |