USPTO serial 75575409
NEW YORK TELEMEDIA ACCELERATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW YORK TELEMEDIA ACCELERATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE J GOLDNER
BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP919 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services; advertising and marketing services, namely, public relations services, issuing press releases, organizing publicity events and developing promotional campaigns for start-up companies engaged in developing new media in the fields of digital television and other high-tech industries, including digital television software, computer programming, and business utilizing the global computer information network and related technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial analysis and consultation services for start-up companies engaged in developing new media in the fields of digital television and other high-tech industries, including digital television software, computer programming, and business utilizing the global computer information network and related technology; venture capital financing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | product research and development services for businesses engaged in developing new media in the fields of digital television and other high-tech industries, including digital television software, computer programming, and business utilizing the global computer information network and related technology; providing start-up companies with support services, namely, engineering and engineering technical consultation services in the field of developing new media in the fields of digital television and other high-tech industries, including digital television software, computer programming, and business utilizing the global computer information network and related technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New York City Investment Fund
- Other trademarks owned by New York City Investment Fund
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NEW YORK TELEMEDIA ACCELERATOR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |