USPTO serial 75575496
MONROE COUNTY'S SENECA PARK ZOO THE WONDER OF LIFE- EVERY DAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2001
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MONROE COUNTY'S SENECA PARK ZOO THE WONDER OF LIFE- EVERY DAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rochester, NY
Rochester, NY
Rochester, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles S. Turner
DANIEL M DELAUS JR RM 307MONROE COUNTY LAW DEPT39 W MAIN STROCHESTER, NY 14616Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | posters; and printed educational materials, namely, pamphlets, informational flyers, and newsletters in the field of zoological services and zoo animals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Monroe County
- Other trademarks owned by Monroe County
- Other trademarks owned by Monroe County
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named MONROE COUNTY'S SENECA PARK ZOO THE WONDER OF LIFE- EVERY DAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |