USPTO serial 75575537
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
72300 Sable Sur Sarthe, FR
75006 PARIS, FR
75006 PARIS, FR
75006 PARIS, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DEEP FROZEN MEATS AND FISH; TINNED, DRIED, COOKED, OR DEEP-FROZEN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES, JAMS, STEWED FRUITS, FRUIT SAUCE; MILK, FRESH CREAM, BUTTER, YOGURTS, SOFT WHITE CHEESES, CHEESES, DESSERTS PREPARED WITH MILK, NAMELY YOGURT WITH FRUIT; MILK FLAVORED WITH CHOCOLATE OR WITH FRUIT FLAVORED SYRUPS; COOKED PORK MEATS; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; PRECOOKED AND CANNED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, POULTRY, FISH AND VEGETABLES; FRESH SOUPS; THE ABOVE MENTIONED PRODUCE BEING OBTAINED THROUGH ORGANIC FARMING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | COFFEE AND ERSATZ COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA; BAKERY DESSERTS PREPARED WITH FRESH CREAM, FLAVORED WITH CHOCOLATE OR VANILLA; FLOURS, PASTA, BREAD, TOAST, RUSKS, CAKES, BISCUITS, ICE-CREAM; HONEYS; MUSTARD, VINEGARS, SALAD DRESSINGS, TOMATO SAUCE; SALT, PEPPER, SPICES; SEASONINGS; PUFFED WHEAT, ROLLED OATS, WHEAT FLAKES, OAT FLAKES, CORN FLAKES, PUFFED CEREALS WITH HONEY, MUESLI; THE ABOVE MENTIONED PRODUCE BEING OBTAINED THROUGH ORGANIC FARMING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES; THIS PRODUCE BEING OBTAINED THROUGH ORGANIC FARMING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | BEERS; MINERAL AND SPARKLING DRINKING WATERS; SOFT DRINKS AND PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS (APART FROM THOSE BASED ON COFFEE, TEA, COCOA AND MILKY DRINKS); FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; SYRUPS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS; THE ABOVE MENTIONED PRODUCE BEING OBTAINED THROUGH ORGANIC FARMING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | WINES, LIQUEURS AND DISTILLED SPIRITS; THIS PRODUCE BEING OBTAINED THROUGH ORGANIC FARMING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |