USPTO serial 75575543
QUARTET 3000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUARTET 3000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ariana G. Voigt
ARIANA G VOIGT MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for graphic image generating and for creating high-fidelity graphic images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by EVANS & SUTHERLAND COMPUTER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QUARTET 3000
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |