Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 75575593?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/75575593. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns VIRTUAL MEETING?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 75575593, the listed owner(s) include: Fouts, Nevin Wayne.

What is USPTO serial number 75575593?

Serial number 75575593 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark VIRTUAL MEETING. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of VIRTUAL MEETING?

VIRTUAL MEETING (75575593) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover VIRTUAL MEETING?

The public record lists International Classes: 009, 038. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: VIRTUAL MEETING Serial# 75575593 | status 603; last event EXPT | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL MEETING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Fouts, Nevin Wayne
Durham, NC
Other trademarks owned by Fouts, Nevin Wayne

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Hultquist

STEVEN J HULTQUIST INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY/TECHNOLOGY LAWP 0 BOX 14329RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	network and communication facilities equipment for linking persons in different locations physically remote from one another, in interactive communication with each other, namely, data communications equipment, namely, data storage, processing, and communications systems comprising multiplexers, modems, convertors, and hubs, routers, switches, repeaters, network interface cards, bridges, transceivers and terminal servers; portable wired and wireless modem-equipped digital processing and display units; and audio and video input and display units	ACTIVE	—
038	interactive telecommunications services, namely, providing and operating communications networks and facilities for linking persons in different locations physically remote from one another, in interactive communication with each other	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 30, 2001	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jun 26, 2001	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Apr 3, 2001	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 26, 2000	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Aug 28, 2000	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 11, 2000	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Aug 11, 2000	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Aug 1, 2000	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 1, 2000	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2000	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 5, 1999	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 7, 1999	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1999	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

VIRTUAL MEETING