USPTO serial 75575674
SCARPETTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCARPETTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil J. Rosini
NEIL J ROSINI FRANKLIN, WEINRIB, RUDELL & VASSALLO488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing articles and apparel, namely T-shirts, sweatshirts, collared shirts, sweaters, tops, pants, shorts, slacks, trousers, skirts, dresses, coats, jackets, scarves, belts, socks, hosiery, shoes, footwear, headwear, hats, neckwear, gloves, mittens, underwear, swimwear, sleepwear, masquerade costumes and masks sold in connection therewith and Halloween costumes and masks sold in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |