USPTO serial 75575787
CHOP WARES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOP WARES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian W. Gray
BRIAN W GRAY BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON28TH FL MAILROOM, P O BOX 25COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1A9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | golf clothing, namely shirts, gloves, hats; golf shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | golf equipment, namely golf clubs, golf balls, golf bag covers, golf bag tags, golf bags, golf ball markers, golf ball retrievers, golf carts, golf club heads, golf club inserts, golf club shafts, golf irons, golf putter covers, golf putters, golf tees, grip tapes for golf clubs, hand grips for golf clubs, head covers for golf clubs | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |