USPTO serial 75576190
CHARMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MALLORY D. LEVITT
AMY CHUMAN PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION5555 MELROSE AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90038-3197UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | hand held units for playing electronic and video games, in-line skates, roller skates, beachballs, rubber bouncing balls, coin-operated pinball game machines, board games, poseable play figures, dolls, toy model hobby craft kits composed of plastic, vinyl and resin molds, jigsaw and manipulative puzzles, toy action figures, toy vehicles, kites, yo-yos, balloons, toy banks, costume masks, hand puppets, crib mobiles, mobiles for children, plush toys, Christmas tree decorations, except confectionery or illumination articles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |