Drawing for Serial No. 75576465

USPTO serial 75576465

Serial No. 75576465

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75576465?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LIONEL L LUCCHESI

LIONEL L LUCCHESI POLSTER LIEDER WOODRUFF763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010HEAD AND CABLE ASSEMBLY FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROFESSIONAL USE MASSAGE MACHINESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 23, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 23, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 4, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 30, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Jan 31, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance