USPTO serial 75576465
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LIONEL L LUCCHESI
LIONEL L LUCCHESI POLSTER LIEDER WOODRUFF763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | HEAD AND CABLE ASSEMBLY FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROFESSIONAL USE MASSAGE MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |