USPTO serial 75576572
ADVANCED PROTECTION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2001
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ADVANCED PROTECTION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1J9, CA
Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1J9, CA
WEST CHESTER, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SARAH OTTE GRABER
SARAH OTTE GRABER WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | radar detectors; combined radar and laser detectors; receiver and alarm apparatus for vehicles to alert the driver thereof of the near presence of emergency vehicles, locomotives, and the like, having transmitters for radio or microwave transmissions for which the receiver is adapted to receive and decode, and for road hazards having like transmitters located nearby; anti-collision apparatus namely receiver and alarm circuits for vehicles, locomotives, and the like to warn of the closing approach of other vehicles, locomotives, and the like, which other vehicles, locomotives and the like, carry similar apparatus so as to send, receive, and decode signals one from another; self-contained devices containing combinations of radar detectors, radar and laser detectors, receiver and alarm apparatus, and anti-collision apparatus, as defined above | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |