USPTO serial 75576642
LOO & PALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOO & PALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN & PLATTP O BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games and playthings, namely, sport balls, baseballs, baseball bats, baseball gloves, toy blocks, board games, archery bow and arrow, building blocks, dart boards and darts, dolls and doll clothing, electronic hand-held games, face masks made of paper, flotation devices for recreational use, namely, kick boards, arm floats and pool rings, footballs, golf clubs, golf bags, ice skates, hockey sticks, basketball, basketball nets, tennis rackets, tennis balls, skis and ski poles, soccer balls, swim goggles, table tennis tables and rackets, children and multiple activity toys, plush toys, stuffed toys, water squirting toys, wind-up toys, toy model train sets, volleyballs, game playing equipment and yoyos; and gymnastic apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |