USPTO serial 75576683
ECOCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2996237Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2005
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-7B532 Tuttlingen, DE
D-78532 TUTTLENGEN, DE
D-78532 TUTTLENGEN, DE
D-78532 TUTTLENGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wesley W Whitmyer Jr
ST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5619Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photographic and video cameras, for endoscopic surgical procedures, carried by a handle adapted to control manipulative endoscopic instruments, and video displays and video recorders responsive to the camera, and related sound receiving, recording and playback of sound which accompanies endoscopic surgical procedures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Endoscopes and a line of instruments for use in endoscopic medical, dental, and veterinary procedures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karl Storz GmbH, & Co
- Other trademarks owned by KARL STORZ GMBH & CO. KG.
- Other trademarks owned by KARL STORZ GMBH & CO. KG.
- Other trademarks owned by KARL STORZ GMBH & CO. KG.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ECOCAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |