USPTO serial 75576936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Business software used in connection with financial services, namely, software used to provide e-commerce decision makers with the necessary data to make decisions about conducting business with potential trading partners by providing data about business credentials; software used for debt collection; software used to generate financial, marketing and credit reports; business statistical information software used to evaluate an e-commerce's business credentials; accounts receivable/payable management software; and software used to generate business lists and marketing lists | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | preparing sales and marketing reports for others; business performance assessment and evaluation services; business evaluation services; business investigation services; providing demographic and other statistical business information; registration and supplying identification numbers for use by business enterprises; business verification services, namely, investigation and confirming all aspects of a business' financial, employee and corporate information; providing business information in the nature of marketing information services, namely, compiling customer profiles; business data analysis; business segmentation services in the nature of business-to-business target marketing and match of buyers with sellers; and accounts receivables/payment management services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing credit information; electronic commerce services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of sales transaction payment data for others; providing information on credit and collections for businesses; preparing credit rating reports for others; preparing financial reports for others; financial research services; investment analysis services; and providing financial information in the field of debt collection | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |