USPTO serial 75577046
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Beverly Hills, CA
A.B.S. Clothing Collection, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN ARTZ ASH
OLIVIA GOODKIN RUTTER HOBBS & DAVIDOFF INCORPORATED1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 1700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SWEAT BANDS, NECK BANDS, WRIST BANDS, BATHING CAPS, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, BATHROBES, BEACH COVERUPS, BEACHWEAR, BELTS FOR CLOTHING, BIKINIS, BODY SHAPERS, BODY SUITS, BONNETS, SKI BOOT BAGS, BOW TIES, BOXER SHORTS, TOE BOXES, BRAS, BRASSIERES, BRIEFS, HOSIERY, UNDERWEAR, LINGERIE, CAMISOLES, CAPES, COATS, HALLOWEEN COSTUMES, MASQUERADE COSTUMES, COVERALLS, COVERUPS, CUFFS, SASHES, SCARVES, SHAWLS, SKI WEAR, HALTER TOPS, FROCKS, GABARDINES, GAITERS, SKI GLOVES, GOLF SHIRTS, HATS, HEAD BANDS, SUN VISORS, SUSPENDERS, BANDANNAS, APRONS, MUFFLERS, HOSIERY, JACKETS, JEANS, JOGGING SUITS, JUMPERS, KIMONOS, KNEE HIGHS, KNICKERS, KNIT SHIRTS, LEGGINGS, SLACKS, LEOTARDS, MITTENS, PANTIES, SLIPS, PANTS, TANK TOPS, TENNIS WEAR, TIGHTS, VEILS, PANTYHOSE, SOCKS, LEG WARMERS, PARKAS, PLAY SUITS, POLO SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, WAISTCOATS, WIND-RESISTANT JACKETS, RAIN COATS, SWEAT SOCKS, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, ATHLETIC SHOES, GOLF SHOES, CLOGS, SLIPPERS, MOCCASINS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, OVERSHOES, BOOTS, SHOES AND SANDALS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |