USPTO serial 75577111
MONTEKIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONTEKIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH R. MARCUS
JOSEPH R MARCUS WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING NURSING AND GENERAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES INCLUDING IN-PATIENT AND OUT-PATIENT MEDICAL SERVICES AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE; MEDICAL AND SURGICAL HOSPITAL SERVICES; SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES; COMPREHENSIVE AND SURGICAL HOSPITAL SERVICES; COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY CARE SERVICES NAMELY CHILDCARE, NURSING AND HEALTH CARE AND FAMILY PRACTICE MEDICAL SERVICES, HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES, ADOPTION AGENCIES, REHABILITATION OF DRUG ADDICTED PATIENTS; PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICES, PHARMACEUTICAL ADVICE SERVICES; MEDICAL, CHEMICAL, DENTAL AND OPTICAL LABORATORIES; MEDICAL SERVICES AND CLINICAL RESEARCH SERVICES; DIALYSIS SERVICES AND PRIMARY CARE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SATELLITE CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |