Drawing for MATHEMATICAL CONTENT RECOGNITION

USPTO serial 75577229

MATHEMATICAL CONTENT RECOGNITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATHEMATICAL CONTENT RECOGNITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik W. Ibele

ERIK W IBELE NEIDER & BOUCHER SCUNIVERSITY RESEARCH PARK440 SCIENCE DR STE 300MADISON, WI 53705-0510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for converting an image file of a real estate description, set of survey coordinates, or other source document bearing alpha-numeric text relating to the lengths and directions of the bounding lines of an area surveyed, into a mathematically accurate vector computer file which will generate a mapACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 7, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 5, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance