USPTO serial 75577240
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J. SEITER
WILLIAM J SEITER MORRISON & SEITER220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, SKIRTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, PANTS, SHORTS, SUITS, DRESSES, JACKETS AND JEANS | ACTIVE | Sep 21, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 31, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |