Drawing for ONE CLOTHING

USPTO serial 75577240

ONE CLOTHING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE CLOTHING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM J. SEITER

WILLIAM J SEITER MORRISON & SEITER220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, SKIRTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, PANTS, SHORTS, SUITS, DRESSES, JACKETS AND JEANSACTIVESep 21, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 31, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 29, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance