USPTO serial 75577279
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven F. Caserza
STEVEN F CASERZA FLEHR HOHBACH TESTALBRITTON & HERBERT LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical communication systems and components, comprising communications apparatus and appliances, namely; optical transmitters; optical receivers; amplifiers; preamplifiers; power supplies; status monitoring and control units, computer hardware, and software; splitters; combiners; communication access nodes for use in wide area networks, local area networks, cable networks, and broadband networks; digital compression units and computer hardware and software; modulation units; broadband, high speed data delivery units, software, and computer hardware; headend controllers, monitors, compression devices, multiplexers, scramblers, modulators and transmission devices; transmission units for use with broadband networks, namely optical fiber, cable, satellite, and wireless networks; headend units, computer hardware, and software for the management and transmission of data; broadband network interfaces; network element management units, computer hardware, and software; and manuals and parts related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | services to communications system providers and users, namely installing, servicing, and maintaining fiber optic, cable, satellite, and wireless high speed, broadband communication systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | services to communication system providers and users, namely designing fiber optic, cable, satellite, and wireless high speed, broadband communication systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |