Drawing for Serial No. 75577574

USPTO serial 75577574

Serial No. 75577574

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75577574?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene A. Tabachnick

GENE A TABACHNICK REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY LLPP O BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004AIR FRESHENERS COMPRISED OR GEL MATERIAL HAVING A PEARL-LIKE APPEARANCE, AND SCENTED AND UNSCENTED CANDLES AND ILLUMINANTS, NAMELY SOLID AND GEL CANDLES COMPRISED OF MATERIAL HAVING A PEARL-LIKE APPEARANCEACTIVEMay 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance