Drawing for NEXT

USPTO serial 75577644

NEXT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica Petraglia McCabe

MONICA PETRAGLIA MCCABE PIPER MARBURY & WOLFE LLP1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020-1104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS AND SWEATSHIRTS AND HEADWEAR, NAMELY HATS, ALL TO BE SOLD SOLELY THROUGH CONCERT AND OTHER PERFORMANCE VENUESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 9, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 7, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 1, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance