Drawing for EMBODY

USPTO serial 75577893

EMBODY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMBODY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol J. Ney

CAROL J NEY THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYONE PROCTER & GAMBLE PLZCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements; vaginal moisturizing gel for use as a personal lubricant; incontinence padsACTIVE—
010Chemically activated heat releasing wraps for therapeutic purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 30, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 21, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 15, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 8, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance