USPTO serial 75577905
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIMI L RODMAN
MIMI L RODMAN TRIBUNE COMPANY435 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 600CHICAGO, IL 60611-4001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Title of a newspaper section featuring information that is of interest to women | ACTIVE | Jun 24, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |