USPTO serial 75578050
GENEALOGICAL LIBRARY MASTER CATALOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2576777Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2002
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENEALOGICAL LIBRARY MASTER CATALOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICK CRUME
131 130TH ST SGLYNDON, MN 56547-9551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Compact discs and multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM or DVD featuring lists, abstracts, extracts, library profiles, and library resources pertaining to genealogical research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 4, 1999 |
| 042 | Providing an online computer database in the field of lists, abstracts, extracts, library profiles, full text of family histories, local histories and library resources pertaining to genealogical research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |