USPTO serial 75578067
LEAN BUSINESS DELIVERY SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEAN BUSINESS DELIVERY SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Brownin
JOHN W BROWNIN ROYSTON, MUELLER, MCLEAN & REID, LLPSTE 600 THE ROYSTON BLDG 102W PENNSYLVANIA AVETOWSON, MD 21204-4575Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED EDUCATIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS, NAMELY, BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, AND MANUALS IN THE FIELD OF LEAN METHODOLOGIES USED TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF BUSINESSES AND THEIR EMPLOYEES | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
| 035 | LEAN METHODOLOGIES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF BUSINESSES AND THEIR EMPLOYEES | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS, NAMELY, LEAN METHODOLOGIES USED TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF BUSINESS AND THEIR EMPLOYEES | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Business Improvement Group LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LEAN BUSINESS DELIVERY SYSTEM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |