USPTO serial 75578096
APPLE FRESH!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976343Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with APPLE FRESH!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAVE CREEK, AZ
Cave Creek, AZ
PHOENIX, AZ
LAUGHLIN, NV
LAUGHLIN, NV
LAUGHLIN, NV
LAUGHLIN, NV
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin and hair and personal care products, namely, skin moisturizers, skin toners and skin cleansing preparations, bath soap, bubble bath, hair shampoo, hair conditioning shampoo, dentifrices and deodorants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOOPES U.S. FOOD GROUP
- Other trademarks owned by David Sloan, a U.S. citizen and Western States Trust Services, a California trust, as trustees of HEI Natural Living
- Other trademarks owned by BEATRICE COMPANIES INC
- Other trademarks owned by BEATRICE INC
- Other trademarks owned by ALMUS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALMUS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALMUS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named APPLE FRESH!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 24, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |