Drawing for SPA RITUALS

USPTO serial 75578127

SPA RITUALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BADAGLIACCA, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPA RITUALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN M CONE

JOHN M CONE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPP O BOX 688DALLAS, TX 75313-0688UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics and toilet preparations, namely, body lotions, hand creams, foot creams, lotions, oils, exfoliators in liquid or cream form, toners and gels, massage oils and creams, cosmetic astringents, facial and body masks, lotions and creams, eye creams, lotions and oils, hair shampoos and conditioners, shower gels, bubble baths, non-medicated bath salts, bath oils and lotions, body powder, skin and toilet soapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 25, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 31, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Oct 8, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 27, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 26, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance