USPTO serial 75578199
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
55268 Nieder-Olm, DE
55268 Nieder-Olm, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID TOREN
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces; eggs; fruit based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | edible oils and fats; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, ready-to-eat cakes, cereal derived breakfast bars, wafers; flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces, condiments, namely, mustard, mayonnaise, ketchup and relish; spices; ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and preparations for making soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |