Drawing for FELLOWSHIP PORTRAIT

USPTO serial 75578304

FELLOWSHIP PORTRAIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FELLOWSHIP PORTRAIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD M. BERMAN

RICHARD M BERMAN FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WELLS FARGO CTR 90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Publication of Photographic Directories for Business and Religious OrganizationsACTIVE—
042Portrait Photography Services for Business and Religious OrganizationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance