USPTO serial 75578349
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COURTNEY DILLAPLAIN
COURTNEY DILLAPLAIN BERGER KAHN SHAFTON MOSS FIGLER SIMON4215 GLENCOE AVE 2ND FLMARINA DEL REY, CA 90292-5634UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fiberoptics, namely, FS-1 fiberoptic replacement cable and FS-2 fiberoptic replacement cable; colorimetry systems, namely, FS-q colorimeter/fluorimeter; measuring devices, namely, FS-1 colorimeter/fluorimeter fluorescence measurement; chemical analysis systems composed of an FS-2 fiber optic sensor system composed of an FS-2 fiber optic monitor, an FS-2 fiberoptic cable, and an FS-2 disposable sensor tip for use in the measurement of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and pH concentrations; disposable probes and sensors composed of FS-2 disposable tips composed of a lightsense disposable tip with factory installed sensing dyes for use in the measurement of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and pH concentrations and FS-1 disposable tips composed of a lightsense disposable tip for use in standard colorimeter or fluorimeter measurements | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |