USPTO serial 75578447
A TASTE OF OUR SOUTHERN HOSPITALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A TASTE OF OUR SOUTHERN HOSPITALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clarke W. Dubose
CLARK W. DUBOSE HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, PA1201 MAIN STREET22ND FLOORCOLUMBIA, SC 29211-1889Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Young Pecan Sales Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Young Pecan Sales Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named A TASTE OF OUR SOUTHERN HOSPITALITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |