USPTO serial 75578580
ETERNAL REALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETERNAL REALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERACTIVE MULTI-MEDIA COMPUTER PROGRAMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL MEDIA, NAMELY, CD ROM'S AND DVD'S FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER AND INTERNET ENTERTAINMENT FEATURING VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SCENARIOS; PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES AND VIDEO DISCS FEATURING COMPUTER-GENERATED ANIMATIONS; INTERACTIVE, MULTI-PLAYER, MULTI-VEHICLE VIDEO GAMES CARTRIDGES, DISCS, TAPES, CASSETTES, AND SOFTWARE THAT IS DOWNLOADABLE FROM THE INTERNET, COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, CARTRIDGES, DISCS, TAPES, CASSETTES, AND SOFTWARE THAT IS DOWNLOADABLE FROM THE INTERNET, MULTI-PLAYER NETWORKED COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME TAPES; VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; AND INTERACTIVE MULTI-MEDIA COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eternal Reality Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Eternal Reality Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ETERNAL REALITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |