CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OPTIFOIL

USPTO serial 75578630

OPTIFOIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIFOIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Friedrich Kueffner

JOSEPH SOFER SOFER & HAROUN LLP317 MADISON AVE STE 910NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC, HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF FOR AUTOMATING AND OPTIMIZING ROLLING PROCESSES, FOR PREPARING AND TRANSPORTING ROLLED MATERIALS, NAMELY ROLLING MILLS, RECOILERS, DECOILERS, CONVEYORSACTIVE—
009ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL APPARATUS FOR MEASURING, CONTROLLING AND REGULATING ROLLING PROCESSES, AND FOR MANAGING DETECTION, EVALUATION AND RECORDING OF DATA FROM ROLLING PROCESSES, NAMELY ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, DATA PROCESSORS, OPTICAL SENSORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 30, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 24, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance