Drawing for THE MAXLOK SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75578649

THE MAXLOK SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MAXLOK SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas J. McEvoy

GIFFORD KRASS GROH SPRINKLE PATMORE ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI280 N OLD WOODWARDSTE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL LOCKS FOR DOORS AND DOORWAYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 12, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 24, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance